Tuesday, December 12, 2006

McCarthyism, The Hollywood Ten and The Puerto Affair

It is time. I have bit my tongue too long. I am opening the can of worms and going on the record. After reading in Velo News that the IPCT group on Friday voted to exclude The Discovery Cycling Team from its membership after Discovery signed Ivan Basso I can only say "WTF?!!!!!!!"

Now before I go any further I want it to be known that I am no "Discovery Team-ophile", I have no posters of Ivan Basso hanging over my bed, I have never signed a "I Believe Tyler" petition and I have no naive notions that professional (hell amateur for that matter) cyclists don't partake in banned, performing enhancing practices. Quite the contrary. I know of the stuff being taken and even personally know former suppliers and delivery men of EPO to members of the domestic peloton. (and before you even ask, "NO", I am not naming any names).

Is it possible that Ivan Basso, Jan Ullrich and every single rider implicated in the Puerto Affair took part in a very intricate and advanced program of blood doping, EPO, HGH and steroid use. Yes it is possible. But until there is any hard evidence out there, I say they are innocent until proven guilty and not the other way around and Dick Pound and WADA, Pat McQuaid and the UCI and now Patrick Lefevere and the IPCT can be lumped into the same category as Joseph McCarthy , HUAC and the Red Scare of the 1950's.

Now for the quick history lesson. Joseph McCarthy was a weasel Republican Senator from Wisconsin who probably would have slid into anonymity were it not for the fact that he discovered the power of communism, public fear and the tactic of "naming names".
To quote the Wikipedia definition of McCarthyism: "During this time people in a variety of situations were accused of being Communists or communist sympathizers and became the subject of aggressive investigations and questioning before government or private-industry panels, committees and agencies. Suspicions were often given credence despite inconclusive or questionable evidence, and the level of threat posed by a person's real or supposed leftist associations or beliefs was often greatly exaggerated. Many people suffered loss of employment, destruction of their careers, and even imprisonment. Most of these punishments came about through trial verdicts that would later be overturned..." (emphasis added by me). So in short, it was the 1950's version of a witch hunt.

Another parallel can be drawn to the HUAC investigations of Hollywood back in the 1940's when the House Un-American Activities Committee called several people from the movie industry to testify about their own suspected involvement in the communist party and to name names. If they refused to answer questions and name names they were blacklisted in the industry and unable to find work. Over 300 names were put on that list (including Arthur Miller, Charlie Chaplin and Burl Ives....That's right, Burl Ives, the snowman narrator from Rudolph the Red Nose Reindeer, was apparently a commie who took part in Un-American Activities. Right. I guess that is where the RED nose came from).

That brings us to our own modern day witch/ pinko hunt: the fight against doping in cycling and more specifically the Puerto Affair, Ivan Basso and the Disco Cycling Team. The IPCT voted to exclude Discovery from its membership over its signing of Italian Ivan Basso, who is implicated in the Puerto inquiry. However, in October the Italian was acquitted by the Italian Olympic Committee (CONI) and his national cycling federation, both of which concluded that there was insufficient evidence to warrant a suspension or to pursue further investigation. So even though, at this time, Basso has been acquitted, just because he was implicated (you know, because they found a name on Fuentes' list that could be translated as the same as Basso's dog) the IPCT, chaired by Quick Step's Belgian team manager Patrick Lefevere (you know Quick Step, a team whose previous forms had riders of such teflon clean images as Johann Museeuw, Frank Vandenbroucke and Richard Virenque) has decided that Discovery can't sit at their lunch table anymore. I say again, WTF?!
What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty? And don't give me the "it's Europe where you are guilty until proven innocent" argument. It's BS as far as I am concerned. He was acquitted, let him get on and do his job. Same for Ullrich and everyone else who has been implicated but not actually found guilty of doing anything. DNA? What other job do you know of where you have to supply DNA to do? We are not talking drug tests here, we are talking about taking, and storing your DNA. They are athletes, not serial killers. A witch hunt, a commie hunt, a "doper" hunt, all the same if you ask me.

Give me your thoughts.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Don't get me started on the corner's WADA takes with it's tests. I appreciate were some of the teams are trying to go with cleaning up the sport, but if you are going to be the good guys you have to act like good guys.

~PruDog.. still struggling with stupid betablogger login.

Anonymous said...

I usually get agitated when people trumpet the "innocent until proven guilty" standard. Due process is certainly good and noble, especially with respect to criminal prosecution.

Your analogy with the Red Scare is quite apt here, and good job emphasizing the link to the consequences the supposed commies suffered with respect to their careers.

Another contrary analogy might be conflict of interest standards in various professions where the mere appearance of a potential conflict of interest is a serious ethical violation that would be grounds for dismissal even when the activity in question caused no harm or broke no laws. Indeed, the dispute with Pro Tour teams hiring Puerto riders seems to involve differing interpretations of the Pro Tour ethical charter and how to apply it in this situation.

Bob Mionske wrote a decent article for Velonews a while back which hashes out the different standards for "guilt" that apply to criminal, civil, and doping proceedings.

I'm personally sitting on the fence here. On the one hand, I would favor even more draconian anti-doping measures -- things that WADA doesn't have the ability to implement, like sting operations, covert surveillance, hotel raids, etc. -- because I think it's required to break the omerta and change the calculus behind the attitude that you're no worse off by doping, winning, and then getting caught than you would be if you had never doped and never won.

On the other hand, the Puerto case has become an utter travesty, with selective leaks, evidence submitted to the UCI and then retracted, a lack of transparency and generally poor dissemination and reporting of what is actually happening with the case. Not to mention the fact "Birillo" (Basso) is assumed to be guilty but "Valv (Piti)" (the name of Valverde's dog) is "clean as teflon." So it's easy to make a case that the powers that be should just ignore Puerto until it either goes away or produces something substantive, which I guess is the point you're making. Sorry about the long comment.

Bryce

Anonymous said...

You make several good points. While we all agree that more needs to be done to stop doping, that effort cannot take precedence over basic concepts of justice. Nice blog. However, lighten up on the Buckeyes... Go Blue! ;)

Anonymous said...

Better dead than red! Or should we say:

Better EPO than going slow!

They're all guilty, I don't even pay attention to cycling results anymore.

Anonymous said...

Since when is doping illegal? I mean after all if a rider is partaking directly in front of an official and not questioned, it must be ok. Seems like every race I was in during the 80's had a dozen riders huffing on salbutamol inhalers at the start line and the referees did nothing at all. It seems hypocritical to me. Maybe they changed the rules eh?

I’ve heard some rider state that they should be able to use whatever dope they want. Make it an open and level playing field just like other pro sports. There is a certain beauty in this but it does seem to go against the Euro “myth-tradition” of the working class poor becoming superstars by means of hard work, sacrifice and sweat on the bike. Everyone knows that cycling is not a poor mans sport. Not with juniors racing on $1200 wheels.

The reality is that if you have money you will buy speed in equipment as well as in ergogenic aids if so desired. That is as long as you have the money. But since when did money ever stop someone from scoring drugs? Steal hubcaps, rob a liquor store, whatever it takes you know? It’s going to happen somehow.